Skip to content

In-House Hiring vs. Finance Team Extension: Evaluating Cost Efficiency for Growing Businesses

outsource new 1

Hiring full-time finance staff costs far more than just their salary. According to the SBA, the true expense ranges from 1.25 to 1.4 times the base pay—meaning a $60K bookkeeper could cost up to $84K annually once you factor in:

  • Payroll taxes, insurance, and benefits
  • Recruiting, onboarding, and training
  • Operational overhead like office space and equipment
  • Ongoing development to keep pace with tech and regulations

Despite these investments, nearly 70% of employees still feel underpaid, and 78% say benefits heavily influence their job satisfaction. The hidden costs stack up fast—and they’re not always worth the long-term commitment.

💡 Enter Finance Team Extension (FTE)

FTE offers a leaner, more scalable alternative. Instead of hiring in-house, you partner with remote finance professionals who integrate directly into your business—without the overhead.

Key benefits:

  • ✅ Fixed monthly pricing (e.g., bookkeeper from $2,000/month)
  • ✅ No payroll taxes, benefits, or compliance headaches
  • ✅ Fast access to vetted, trained experts
  • ✅ Flexibility to scale up or down as needed

But beware: not all outsourced teams deliver consistent quality. Poor execution can lead to costly errors and compliance risks. That’s why choosing a trusted provider is critical.

At Accrual Global, you get QuickBooks-certified ProAdvisors with deep GAAP expertise—at up to 60% less than in-house hires. It’s cost-efficiency without compromise.